Analytics for Chemistry, Biology and Production: |
|||
| A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. -from Pope, early 18th. | |||
|
|
The author of this page is independent and has no commercial intention in mind ! | Diese Seite in Deutsch. | |||
|
Near Near InfraRed (NNIR): |
|
Are you knowing, that also in the NNIR region (800 - 1050 nm) the Beer - Lambert law is strictly followed be almost every substance ? But in the NNIR it is even more required, to think in spectra and not in single wavelength, otherwise you will have very small success ! As you can see from the examples of tert-butanol and propan-1-ol in non-polar solvent, from the paper that follows, it is much more happened as believed, that also a pure substance will present itself as a mixture of two species, and that means two individual spectra, and never a single wavelength ! | Near Near Infrared Spectroscopy for Quantitative and Qualitative Quality Control Authors: Tamzin A. Lafford, Yvette Cornélis and Peter Forster,* Ciba - Geigy AG, CH-4002 Basle, Switzerland |
| Summary Absorbance spectra from near near infrared (NNIR; 800- 1050nm) spectroscopy of organic liquids are measured using a silicon diode array spectrometer. No sample dilution is necessary as the absorbance values are low. Multi-component analysis applied to complete NNIR spectra provides both quantitive and qualitive information, essential in industrial quality control. Acceptable accuracy (error < 1%) is achieved in the quantitative analysis of mixtures of non-interacting substances, and it is also possible to analyse alcohols in non-polar solvents, where intermolecular H-bonding occurs. Principal component regression was also performed on the NNIR data to give qualitative information. Keywords: Introduction Lately, infrared (IR; 2500-15000nm) and near infrared (NIR; 1000-2500nm) spectroscopy have more frequently been used to obtain qualitative information. In the past, this has been achieved by visual comparison of the sample spectrum with a reference. A great improvement on this method was the use of factor analysis of NIR spectra, [1]. A ‘learning set’ of several reference spectra is required, against which the sample spectrum is compared. The results of the analysis are plotted in factor space, the spectra of each different substance forming a separate cluster of points. The sample can be identified by its relative position in the factor space. Multicomponent analysis (MCA) is a simple least-squares regression algorithm, [ 2, 3]. It uses the data at all the wavelengths considered, if so desired. However, for accuracy, it is necessary that the Beer-Lambert law is obeyed at every wavelength taken. The method is currently being used in the UV/VIS region in this laboratory with increasing success. A standards list consisting of one spectrum of each of the relevant pure components is compiled by the user. The MCA then compares the test spectrum with the standards and constructs the least-squares fit from linear combination. The proportions required of each spectrum are converted into component concentrations. A chi-squared ‘error of fit’, normalized with respect to the system noise and sensitivity, is also returned. This is a measure of how closely the reconstructed spectrum fits the test data. It is a sensitive qualitative measure; a poor fit can indicate that the standards chosen are not appropriate to the sample composition, or that some intermolecular interaction occurs that influences the sample spectrum. The standards list can then be revised, or the wavelength range considered adjusted to improve the fit. Sample preparation is not necessary for NIR measurements but quantitative analysis is complicated, as the spectra contain overlapping bands and are strongly influenced by intermolecular interactions. Multicomponent analysis using reference spectra is not viable[*], and more complex algorithms such as principal component regression (PCR) and partial least-squares using factors rather than reference spectra, [4], are required. These involve tedious calibration procedures. Spectra from near near infrared (NNIR; 800-1050 nm) spectroscopy of many
organic liquids exhibit sharper bands with less overlap than the NIR spectra.
The NNIR spectra are conveniently measured with silicon
diode arrays, no sample dilution and almost no sample preparation
is required as the absorbances are low. The aims of this investigation
were: |
ExperimentalThe NNIR absorbance spectra were measured using an HP 8452a extended visible diode array spectrometer (Hewlett-Packard). It was equipped with a multi-cell transporter holding two quartz cells of 10.0 mm optical pathlength. To counteract instrumental drift, it proved necessary to simulate a double beam apparatus. One cell (the ‘blank’) was filled with solvent (CCl4). The other was a flow through cell connected to an AMICA 5000 dynamic dilutor, [5], from which the sample, accurately diluted as required, was delivered. The dilutor was driven by the system software. The spectrum of the blank was always measured directly after the sample spectrum, and then subtracted from it mathematically. Measurements are also sensitive to the effects of turbulence following the injection of the liquid into the cell. Turbulence causes fluctuations in the refractive index of the sample, which then appears as noise in the absorbance spectrum. This was overcome by a stabilization time of 180s prior to the measurement. The spectra of pure organic liquids and of concentrations down to 40 % v/v in CCl4 were recorded. Propan-1-ol was measured down to 0.05% concentration. Some two-component mixtures were also investigated over the range from 95 to 5% v/v. Multicomponent analysis was performed within the instrument software, which was written in this laboratory. The standards list in each case consisted of spectra of the relevant pure substances and included a flat ‘dummy’ spectrum to account for any flat drift in the baseline of the instrument between measurements. For treatment by PCR the data were transferred to the ICAP software package (Bran and Luebbe). The spectra were usually differentiated before analysis to eliminate the effects of any baseline offset between them (the substitute for the flat dummy in the MCA software package). |
Results and DiscussionNNIR Spectra of LiquidsSpectral features in the NNIR are sharper that in the NIR. Pure organic liquids show absorbances (0.02-0.07 using a 10.0 mm light path) with a characteristic peak around 900 nm for aliphatic compounds. This is shifted to shorter wavelengths for aromatic compounds. Some typical spectra are shown in Fig. 1. The spectrum of water, by contrast, has a peak at 980 nm with an absorbance of 0.2. Quantitative AnalysisDilutions in CCl4 The observance of the Beer-Lambert law in the NNIR by many organic liquids was confirmed. This was carried out by checking the correlation of the absorbance at a given wavelength with the concentration. The wavelength chosen was at a maximum in the spectrum, in order to minimize the influence of noise. (For alcohols, it was necessary to ignore the peak at about 970 nm, see below.) The standard error of estimate of the linear regression in terms of absorbance was Sy.x <0.0001 in most cases. Therefore, the Beer-Lambert law is closely followed. |
|
|
Multicomponent analysis was carried out over the whole NNIR range on the spectra recorded. For toluene, benzene and heptane of concentrations from 100 to 40% in CCl4 a calculation error (residual concentration) of better than 0.5% relative was achieved. Poorer accuracy was obtained with some other substances, e.g., cyclohexane and 1,4-dioxane, which have two possible molecular configurations. The proportions present of each configuration depend on the temperature, which was not necessary constant during the measurements. Problems with electronic interference have so far frustrated attempts at temperature stabilization of the samples. Improved results are expected upon implementation of thermostatic control. It will then be interesting to see how well MCA in the NNIR can differentiate between molecular configurations. In studying alcohols diluted in CCl4 an absorbance peak that did not obey the Beer-Lambert law was found. It occurs between 960 and 980 nm, depending on the alcohol (see Fig. 2). It is assigned to an overtone of the OH-stretching vibration, and its amplitude versus concentration characteristic is influenced by the degree of intermolecular hydrogen bonding, [6, 7]. |
|
|
This self-association of alcohols in non-polar solvents precludes the
application of MCA over the entire NNIR wavelength range. The reliability
of the analysis can be improved in two ways: The relative accuracies of the above methods are illustrated in Fig.3 for dilutions of propan-1-ol in CCl4. As the alcohol concentration decreases, the OH peak becomes more significant and corrections are more important. (In the following figures the true concentration is that prepared with the dynamic dilutor.) |
|
|
Have you now realized in Fig. 3, that as soon as we have corrected our model by adding a 1% standard, — in reality we have also two species in our solution/cuvette — , we also got the correct results for our concentration determination !!!!! Now you are knowing, if an “old” spectroscopist will tell you, that in the NNIR region most samples will not follow the Beer - Lambert law, that he is not right, because he never thought in spectra !!!! If we have used only a single wavelength, you can imagine by your self, how big our errors would be, depending on which wavelength you would select for "measuring" the concentration !!!! Peter Forster. |
Two-component mixturesSome mixtures of two absorbing pure liquids were also investigated. The concentration of one component relative to the other ranged from 5 to 95% v/v. The MCA could be performed with an error of far better than 1%, if the components did not interact (e.g., by H-bounding). The result of MCA on toluene-heptane mixtures are given in Fig. 4. |
|
Qualitative AnalysisMulticomponent analysis algorithmThe software used for the MCA has the advantage that quantitative and qualitative information are delivered simultaneously. The concentration is calculated, and the normalized error of fit can be used as a qualitative indicator as it measures how closely the test spectrum can be matched by a linear combination of the standard spectra (see above). Step can be taken to improve a bad fit (e.g., by restricting the wavelength range considered, as with the alcohols, see under Dilution in CCl4), but it is necessary to decide the extent to which this is reasonable. A persistently poor fit indicates that the sample is incompatible with the standards selected. Principal component regressionThe NNIR spectra are also suitable for analysis by PCR. The spectra of two-component mixtures are separated into well defined clusters in factor space, as shown in Fig. 5. Here, the clusters have degenerated into lines as the data cover wide concentration ranges. The end of a line corresponds to 95% concentration of one of the components. Note the near-coincidence of two of the lines at one end: this occurs where the mixtures both contain 95% propan-1-ol. It is also possible to construct a quantitative model within the PCR software. This requires more work than with the MCA in order to build a set of calibration spectra. The spectra of 0.05-100% propan-1-ol in CCl4 were examined in this way. The process yielded two factors: factor one with an eigenvalue of 0.2829 and factor two 0.0024. The former correlates well with the concentration (r = 0.999, relative standard deviation = 0.7%). Factor 2 improves the concentration prediction for very weak solutions (relative standard deviation = 0.6%) where the OH peak is dominant in the spectrum (see under Dilutions in CCl4). It describes the evolution of intermolecular interactions with the alcohol concentration. |
|
That's not absolutely true, because factors are never real spectra! The whole set of factors found, needs first to be "rotated" in the right way, to build the real spectra of the individual components, and that's even an estimation of the concrete spectra !!! So it must be told, that factor 2 is, in best case, representing, but normally only standing for, this intermolecular interactions, but it is never a description of it !!!! “Too many cooks spoil the soup” Peter Forster. |
|
ConclusionsSpectrometry in the NNIR region (800-1050 nm) is suitable for routine industrial quality control. The NNIR spectra are readily measured using silicon diode arrays, and time-consuming sample preparation is eliminated as the absorbance values are low. Unlike NIR spectra, NNIR spectra of organic liquids contain distinct bands. The simple, rapid MCA algorithm is applicable and delivers quantitative and qualitative information simultaneously. For liquids with no intermolecular interactions, this method can be applied directly to the entire NNIR spectrum. It is also possible to study substances such as alcohols in non-polar solvents if the interactions are taken into account. The NNIR spectra are also suitable for qualitative analysis by PCR. Distinct clusters are formed in factor space by the spectra of the different substances investigated. Construction of a quantitative model with this algorithm is also possible, but requires a calibration set of many spectra. Similarly, more complex algorithms are also available. It is hoped to improve the present system further by stabilizing the sample temperature. The use of cells with longer optical pathlengths should improve the signal-to-noise ratio, although it might be necessary to extend the stabilization time to allow for the greater turbulence. |
References[1] Gemperline, P.J., and Weber, L. D., Anal. Chem., 1989, 61, 138. [2] Brown, C. W., Lynch, P. F., Obremski, R. J., and Lavery, D. S., Anal. Chem., 1982, 54, 1472. [3] Perkampus, H. H., UV-VIS-Spektroskopie und ihre Anwendungen, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986. [4] Fuller, M. P., Ritter, G. L., and Draper, C. S., Appl. Spectros., 1988, 42, 217. [5] Valser, P. E., and Bartels, H., Am. Lab., 1982, 12(2), 32. [6] Shinomiya, K., and Shinomiya, T., Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1990, 63, 1093. [7] Kunst, M., van Duijn, D., and Bordewijk, P., Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem., 1979, 83, 840.
[*] "MCA using ....... is not viable!": |
Additional References for the Near Near Infrared Wavelenght range:Additional References for Researchs made in this Wavelength range you will find under:[1] Infralytic GmbH, Dr. H. Freitag: www.infralytic.de NNIR-References: www.infralytic.de/g_referenz_en.htm
|
![]() |
Peter Forster:
|
|
Software Development & Consulting Peter Forster Neubadstrasse 88 CH-4054 Basle, Switzerland Mail to: peter.forster@p-forster.com |
Dies Seite in Deutsch |