Analytics for Chemistry, Biology and Production:

It is never too late to mend. - It is the first step that is difficult.  -late 16th.


Peter ForsterHome The author of this page is independent and has no commercial intention in mind ! Diese Seite in Deutsch.


Spectroscopy:

The bad example (from the year 1983), to measure a sample in a unbuffered solvent!

Our historical Sample: The same mistake we never did again!
What you see here is tha same sample (from the same/identical bottle) in the "identical" solvent:  Ethanol with the quality label - UVASOL. - It means special medaled produced for spectroscopy -, once from a fresh opened bottel of Lot A, and once from a fresh opened bottle of Lot B, but all from the identical supplier!

And finaly you see the spectrum of the same sample in a mixture of Ethanol/Buffer pH 4.65 (1:1):

                     - (The only spectrum, that can be reproduced again and again in exact the same precision!!!)
Bad_Example
Can you imagine, how wrong your concentration result would be, calculated as usually at Lambdamax. of 654 nm, if you did the calibration in Alcohol from Lot A and your sample measurement in Alcohol from Lot B ?

That's why “old” spectroscopist are telling you, you must measure your reference and your samples not only in the same solvent, they are telling you, you must prepare enough solvent for both measurements and do all time both measurements together !
As you now know , they are completely wrong !   But you have to learn, to think in spectra !


And now my three simple Questions to see what you have just learned:
  1. ) What is the Worth of all the puplished Spectra-Atlases, if you count into your calculation what solvents they have used?
          Answer: ?
  2. ) What is the Worth of all the puplished 'molar absorptivity coefficents', if you count into your calculation what solvents they have used?
          Answer: ?
  3. ) But - Why we still us/ are able to use/ will also in future be able to us, our 25 year old spectra with a better precision than 0.25% ?
          Answer:  YES!   We never did the same mistake again!   But also because and because!
Go back to Spectroscopy


P. Forster Peter Forster: Software Development & Consulting
    Back Home
    Back to Index

Software Development & Consulting
Peter Forster
Neubadstrasse 88
CH-4054 Basle, Switzerland

Mail to: peter.forster@p-forster.com

         

Die selbe Seite in Deutsch